Thank you so much! That is what I did, but the book answer is giving me an answer of .333; so I thought I was doing it wrong?
There is also a question in the study guide similar this where I would think you would use the same equation as above to find Cp but it says to use this equation instead:
Cp=USL-LSL/ 6(R bar/d2)
Are you familiar with this equation and why we would use it to find Pp or Cp?
Original Message:
Sent: 01/27/24 08:09 PM
From: Shannon Rice
Subject: Process Performance Pp- please help
80.25 - 79.75 = 0.5
6 x .625 = 3.75 (You multiple the six by your standard deviation)
0.5 / 3.75 = .133
That suppliers process is not meeting expectations, as demonstrated by the sample size average being below the LSL.
------------------------------
Shannon Rice
Quality Assurance Evaluator
Hot Springs AR
Original Message:
Sent: 01/27/24 07:03 PM
From: Mimi Dalaly
Subject: Process Performance Pp- please help
Hello,
I am having a hard time with one of the chapter questions regarding process performance: I have followed the formula for Pp and I am getting it wrong: The problem is:
A process produces a part that is required to measure between 79.75 and 80.25 inches wide. As part of the supplier qualification process, samples were collected and yielded a process mean of 79.5 inches, and the long-term standard deviation was 0.625 inches. What is the Pp for this process?
I am using the formula Pp= USL-LSL/ 6(sigma). I am assuming the USL= 80.25 and LSL =79.75. The answer is .333 but I am not getting that with following this formula.