Measurement System Analysis for Automated Systems

In MSA, is it acceptable/valid to replace “operator” with “machine” for measurement systems that don't involve an operator? An example is where I want to check the repeatability and reproducibility amongst three separate but identical automated measurement systems.

4 Replies
Anish Shah
4 Posts

Don - A lot depends on what the test criteria is for - machine, fixtures used on the machine, set up/qualification of the machine prior to measurement. MSA manual ( from AIAG ) while addresses basic criteria, falls short of many aspects that are brought forth in the world of automation. Softwares do come to our rescue, but than the user ( inputs ) are critical to process the information given!

Absolutely that is acceptable. Just make sure to document that in the report. Be sure to randomize the part order before each trial. If you are doing 3 trials, consider doing trial 2 on day 2 after a power- down/power-up cycle and maybe trial 3 is done in some other normal & acceptable condition (e.g. day 3 late evening). That will give you a strong look at Reproducibility.

Yes, I have done this in the past when I wanted to prove that multiple test instruments were equivalent to each other, or whether a new one was equivalent to the one it was replacing.